hooo.

27 Nov 2005 12:08 am
kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
Kifed this link from Tiercel, who had it posted awhile back but I'd never followed it...damn, I should've. You want Narnia? You want Disney doing Narnia? Here's your response, babe.

Cripes, they're doing a live-action version of Charlotte's Web...with Julia Roberts as Charlotte? Yegawdz.
kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
I've heard this comment before, even from a few women I've known personally, and it always puts me in the strange spot of not sure whether to laugh hysterically, smack the person, or just grab the woman's purse, snatch her wallet, tear up her driver's license, any credit cards in her own name, and her voter registration card. I'm sure you've heard the comment, at some point in your life:

I hate feminists.

Maybe we're a little unclear on the concept, people. To say, as a woman, in an industrialized society, that you hate feminists is sort of like... oh, I don't know. I can't even think of an analogy asinine enough to match it, let alone with the additional hypocrisy when spoken by a woman. Three words, and you, too, can reveal yourself as an mindless twit! Come on everyone, it's easy!

Get a grip and learn a little, because those words just demonstrate your ignorance. I say ignorance, because the popular notion bandied about at times, as implied by the explanations given by the same women speaking, usually carries a certain presumption of behaviors/values. They're all wrong, dead wrong; feminism is not a mono-culture. Feminism does not automatically mean MAN-HATING. It does not automatically mean ATHEIST. It is not equivalent to LESBIAN. It does not necessarily mean PRO-ABORTION. And no, it does not even require a belief that ALL PORN IS EVUUL.

The one element that drives all mainstream feminism, really, is simply: women are equal to men. So you know what that means, class? Men can be feminists, too. I've had the good fortune to know that every single lover I've ever had is a feminist, because every single one of them looked at me, at all women, and saw an equal.

But that's okay! You can still hate feminists, but here's what I expect you to do... )
kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
I seriously heart the Rude Pundit. Today he's writing about the random searches in NYC [read more about what to do if you walk into one], and observes:

This is the warped logic of our discussions of civil liberties: if you are a good, lawful person, then you shouldn't mind having yourself probed, spied on, and frisked. Principles like the Fourth Amendment are merely covers for the guilty.

Read the whole thing.

And this, I want stapled on the forehead of every politico on the hill, right where they can see it and can't frickin' miss it, no matter what:

In an ideal America, government should be open to the sunshine and air, and citizens' lives should be private. But the Bush administration has reversed this foundational principle.

Which in a nutshell sums up the majority of what has me so uncertain about the state of our nation, these days.
kaigou: this is what I do, darling (bang)
Let's get this clear. If I hear one more time that a woman cannot write a man, a gay man, a straight man, a gun-toting man, a young man, or a cane-using gray-haired doddering old man -- and all criticisms often said by a MAN -- I'm going to go fucking ballistic. I'm warning you, people, I'm a donkey on the edge. I have a temper and I'm past the point of being afraid to use it!

Look, it's bullshit. Plain and simple. )

And in case you're wondering, this goes just as much for me, too. If we can't write, we might as well go back to washing dishes and refilling coffee cups.
kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
A plethora of commentary, thanks to some writer named Hobbs of whom I'd never heard until she decided to blather at a level of superiority only rivalled by A. Rice's declaration that she perfects every sentence completely before going to the next, and this is why she doesn't require an editor. Uh. Whatever -- with refs to flist comments. ) I need chocolate.

I quit.

18 Dec 2004 12:15 am
kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
Note. My language is bad, because I am in a truly rare mood. I don't often scream. I've never thrown anything while angry. Well, once, but I was six, so that doesn't count. Tonight? I'm mad. I'm beyond mad. I'm just low-down, ice-to-numb.

Anyway.

I trust you guys, so I'm hoping this won't show up in the latest nonsense elsewhere, but I have to say it.

I quit.

I fucking quit. Quit, quit, quit. )
kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
I just discovered that on a certain ranty little LJ comm, several folks drew a curious conclusion. Being a community full of anonymice, people can post as they please (and damn if it don't get confusing - who are you talking to? they're all anonymous!). So someone rec'd me, and used the phrase 'rinse and repeat'. Apparently, because I've used this phrase myself, the conclusion was drawn that I was praising myself as a sockpuppet.

*pauses to consider that for a moment*

Yes! I must have coined the phrase, and therefore all its royalties for use come back to me! Pay up, all you shampoo companies. You OWE me.

*runs off to trademark office*

In the same thread, I was utterly delighted (if bemused) to read this, too:
She achieved her notoriety by sucking up to and praising almost every writer in the fandom. I've seen the personal emails to prove it. What makes her popular is not her fantastic writing style but her gift of gab. She knows how to flatter and stroke egos. We all know the gundam Wing fandom is full of over blown egos. Her being embraced is merely further testament to that.
I'm starting to think that giving concrit - where you compliment a person's work, while trying to diplomatically point out where things could be improved - must be a rare art. Or maybe it is for the anonymous person who wrote that. Or maybe the person isn't a writer and doesn't realize how painful it is for some writers to post their stuff, and how cruel it would be to not have something nice to say in with any constructive critcism. Maybe I'm too Southern, having this silly notion that if I can't say something nice when critting, why say anything at all? I just never thought I'd be put down for doing something that I consider nothing less than principled, and an expression of treating others how I'd want to be treated - with "this is what I liked" mixed in with "this is what (I think) needs work". I mean, really. A good concrit should leave you with suggestions for how to get better (which hopefully prompts your own ideas), and a bit of a warm fuzzy feeling that someone liked your story.

(And I do not agree that the statement, "well, I took the time to review" should be considered enough, in and of itself, to compliment a writer. People will take the time to write some really nasty stuff, and that's not a compliment in the least. Well, unless you're one of those people who says, "hey! the story did provoke a response in someone, so that's good, right?" Well...I guess.)

Although it's always funny to read people's criticisms of my stories and think, "uh, I won't post on a dead thread, but actually, I agree with you."

*snerk*
kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
and someone wrote... )

*shakes fist*

I am a DIVA! Fear me!

Geebus, people.

You yank one damn story from the internet, try to be polite and explain why, and there's always got to be someone who gets on your case about it. Asuka K., got any tips on stompage, or should I just let it go?

But if I wanted your opinion, I'd frickin' well BEAT it out of you. )
kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
Do we have a BIAS, people?

I'm just cranky recently, I suppose. )

However, I feel so much more enlightened now that I'm aware of yet another frickin' religion in the world. Anarchism! Boy. What would I do without the internet to tell me these things.
kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
Damn if I'm not this close to declaring Tetractys as incomplete for at least a month. Take a hiatus. I so loathe doing that - I keep telling myself, just six more chapters and it's done! - but this part upcoming will be the hardest to write. I don't like writing when my heart's not in it - that seems like gypping the folks who've hung in there, this long. And I do still plan to finish Contraries...just haven't been in an FmA mood.

If I see one more instance of wank from that damn fandom, I swear... )
kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
Where to start, where to start.

Oh, right.

Mewling.

The above word should just be stripped, STRIPPED, I say... )

patterns of speech )

But if I could just get rid of mewling, I'd be happy with that for now. My plans for world domination can wait a bit longer.

[EDIT]: Ah, almost forgot. Merith reminded me, though.

Brooks Jensen had an article in Lenswork... )
kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
...Because then there's the reviews that just make you go *stompstompstomp*

Your story started very good and interested but you made it each time more and more complicated. AND the result is not GW anymore even if they are in, no it is some strange story. What every you wanted to reach with you story I dont think you are going in good direction. You have very good talent for writing but here it is not GW story anymore. Come on, do something here. Dont get mad.

Yes, this would be the point of an AU, girly. Ah, another poor fan who honestly believes safe-houses and unrequited luuuurve make up the majority of the storyline. Because obviously war, despair, philosophy, and mecha (can't forget the mecha!) aren't GW.

Then again, Tyr (the GWA archivist) mentioned to me the other day that her most common complaint about my stories is that they're never IC; in her opinion, it's all ofic with GW names slapped on. I told her, I don't take it personally anymore. Now, when she tells me that, I'm happy, because it means the rest of the fandom will read it as being completely IC. It's when she tells me the story's IC (like Trace, which she really liked) that I get worried.

It's like reverse archivist psychology, or something.

*stomps off*