word choices
23 Mar 2011 12:43 amI was writing a reply recently and stumbled at a description. "Straightforward," I started to type, then paused, backed up, and pondered for a bit before coming up with "forthright". When rereading before hitting the post button, it occurred to me that I do this rather often, with the following words and phrases, and use alternates instead.
straight up => right out
straighten out => clear up, set right
go straight => go forward
setting someone straight => correcting, telling clearly
a straight answer => succinct answer
straight through => all the way through
___ straight [period of time] => ___ unbroken [time], ___ uninterrupted [time]
They're not all perfect synonyms, and sometimes I can see I've done a bit of a sidestep around my kneecap to get to my elbow, just to avoid the word. It's not like I'm trying to be PC, only that I think I took it to heart the joke a gay friend used to make, when I was in college: "never go straight, go crooked." (Though if feeling cranky, he'd say, "don't go straight, get bent.")
My sensitivity to the word and its connotations means I'm equally sensitive to reading the word in anyone else's writing. Not that I judge when I see it, only that I think, here is someone not sensitive to that, the way I am, sort of like when you're surprised that someone doesn't get hay fever like you. Neither good nor bad, just a bit of ah 'oh' observation. If someone else also avoids the word... that's harder to assess, because unless it's a really obvious one (where 'straight' would be kind of the default term, so to speak), there are different ways to say just about anything, so the absence isn't proof of anything.
But am I the only one who goes out of the way to avoid certain, specific words? And not even words that necessarily politically loaded, either -- because I also avoid 'overt' and 'sublime', whenever I can.
straight up => right out
straighten out => clear up, set right
go straight => go forward
setting someone straight => correcting, telling clearly
a straight answer => succinct answer
straight through => all the way through
___ straight [period of time] => ___ unbroken [time], ___ uninterrupted [time]
They're not all perfect synonyms, and sometimes I can see I've done a bit of a sidestep around my kneecap to get to my elbow, just to avoid the word. It's not like I'm trying to be PC, only that I think I took it to heart the joke a gay friend used to make, when I was in college: "never go straight, go crooked." (Though if feeling cranky, he'd say, "don't go straight, get bent.")
My sensitivity to the word and its connotations means I'm equally sensitive to reading the word in anyone else's writing. Not that I judge when I see it, only that I think, here is someone not sensitive to that, the way I am, sort of like when you're surprised that someone doesn't get hay fever like you. Neither good nor bad, just a bit of ah 'oh' observation. If someone else also avoids the word... that's harder to assess, because unless it's a really obvious one (where 'straight' would be kind of the default term, so to speak), there are different ways to say just about anything, so the absence isn't proof of anything.
But am I the only one who goes out of the way to avoid certain, specific words? And not even words that necessarily politically loaded, either -- because I also avoid 'overt' and 'sublime', whenever I can.
no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 06:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 06:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 06:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 06:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 07:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 04:01 pm (UTC)I got a chuckle out of your subsitute phrases. To mangle Tom Lehrer 'When correctly viewed, everything is rude.'.
Kat
no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 24 Mar 2011 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 07:06 am (UTC)I have noticed I use some words or phrases too much, and often that's an artifact of adopting some kind of "standard image" or stereotypic idea about what is happening in a scene. It's quicker to use a quickie phrase everybody gets easily, instead of reinventing language all the time, but repeating it too often is a problem.
The other maddening thing I find in my own editing is a repeated use of a word in two *different* meanings of the same word, close enough to rest within a few paragraphs of each other. The kind of word, like gaily, which jumps out at you as unusual enough that repeated use looks weird. Like, it can only be used once in a thousand words, at least. I'm forced to recast both sentences because in each sentence alone they are the best choice, and sometimes really the only choice, to use there. It may be my subconscious at play, but it drives me crazy!
no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 07:16 pm (UTC)Some words are like fancy spices. Use sparingly, or not at all.
no subject
Date: 25 Mar 2011 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 12:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 01:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 01:53 pm (UTC)But that's kind of tangential to this. The word that I tend to be kind of careful with is hard. *wry* I, uh. Have spent too much time writing boyslash to not be careful with that one.
no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 07:18 pm (UTC)I am such a twelve-year-old, sometimes.
no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 04:22 pm (UTC)Did you ever read anything by Tom Stoppard? For some reason this topic makes me think of his stuff, and especially of his adorable play Arcadia.
no subject
Date: 23 Mar 2011 07:19 pm (UTC)Me: YEAH. Because I totally MEANT to do that!
no subject
Date: 24 Mar 2011 04:03 pm (UTC)Sorry if I'm perceived as anti-gay because I use the term "straightforward", but oh well... *shrugs*