why did it take this long?
6 Mar 2011 01:28 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I won't go into any irons I may have in the fire (but I will say it's long since died past embers), but it still surprises me -- and disappoints me greatly -- to discover that this conversation in the pagan world is only now occurring with any significant intensity. It's 2011 already, people. This debate is long overdue.
no subject
Date: 8 Mar 2011 03:12 am (UTC)That's the word we need for a lot of the newage out there.
no subject
Date: 8 Mar 2011 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 8 Mar 2011 06:25 pm (UTC)That's the issue in a nutshell, with multiculturalism, I think.
CP and I had a long talk about this last night, trying to get him to see past the unquestioned privilege to understand that when a POV is inundated in the media/culture (e.g., "real indians live in teepees and wear eagle-headdresses") that someone whose life is intimately negated by that representation is not able to just "ignore it and go about their business". And furthermore, that person is marginalized both by the creation of that mal-representation and further by the repetition via a privileged person, so they're doubly erased. It takes privilege to be able to ignore erasure, because privilege is what makes you visible to be able to countermand erasure. When you don't have privilege, you have no means/bullhorn/venues to counter the mis-representation.
It'd be awfully nice to say that it doesn't matter what people think of you/your culture, but the fact is, when they have privilege, they're going to think they have the right to tell you how your culture works.
It's a fuzzier area when it comes to someone who, say, actually lived in that culture (for short or long time), who comes home with strange/new customs or objects or cuisine. That, I see as a gentler (less appropriative, in the negative sense) kind of cultural adoption, because the person put in the time. Or maybe it's that they first met the custom/object/food in context, and so are aware that there's more to the picture. If you've seen the entire gamut of Cantonese food on a friend's table, you may only learn one recipe but you're aware there's more than just that one noodle dish.
Unfortunately, most pagans I've known who are anywhere near eclectic, just take one thing out of context, and ignore the rest (assuming what they adopt doesn't get mangled as well). Then they compound that, because their privilege grants them the boneheadedness to assume that their (mangled, contextless) version is correct -- and then go about correcting people who really do have a clue. (Note: the worst is when it's intersectional, and it's a male pagan correcting a woman from the appropriated culture. UGH.)
That drove me up the wall, sometimes, as much as I loved the community I served.