procedural question
4 Feb 2011 04:18 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
If the police/authorities bring someone in for questioning, but have not charge the person with a crime, can they take fingerprints? Or is that considered invasive or violating rights or potential self-incrimination if they do so before formally charging the person?
...Not just the US, that is, if you're not US and you have any vague idea of the procedure where you live, then I'd be curious to hear that, too. Mostly because I like police procedural dramas, in any language, and the "we think he's this guy (or he looks just like this other guy)" mistaken identity (or non-mistaken undercover schtick) is a common plot-step the world over, it seems. And since that would so easily be cleared up by a set of freaking fingerprints, I'm wondering when I should see the non-fingerprinting as accurate for a culture, versus a plot-hole.
...Not just the US, that is, if you're not US and you have any vague idea of the procedure where you live, then I'd be curious to hear that, too. Mostly because I like police procedural dramas, in any language, and the "we think he's this guy (or he looks just like this other guy)" mistaken identity (or non-mistaken undercover schtick) is a common plot-step the world over, it seems. And since that would so easily be cleared up by a set of freaking fingerprints, I'm wondering when I should see the non-fingerprinting as accurate for a culture, versus a plot-hole.
no subject
Date: 7 Feb 2011 06:30 pm (UTC)Semi-related: you might want to avoid ever mentioning what cops can do in Japan. It'd either make your dad gnash his teeth at the bureaucracy/laws that make his job really difficult sometimes... or it'd make him gnash his teeth at how much easier it'd be to abuse the citizenry without those obstacles.
(Like, say, the lack of a need for search warrants for private residences. No assumption of privacy!)