kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
[personal profile] kaigou
okay, slightly less grumpy layout style, now. hrmmm. got to say, I really don't care for css where there's eighty freaking titles and embeds on every level. whatever happened to the notion of simple and elegant code?

Date: 3 Jan 2009 03:32 am (UTC)
branchandroot: oak against sky (Default)
From: [personal profile] branchandroot
*tips head* What's your overflow setting? It looks a bit as though I'm getting the right side cropped off without getting a scroll bar at the bottom. Are the user pics supposed to be really hard up against the right side of the page? (I can't see the right side of their black border.)

That said, it's quite snazzy.

*amused* I used to think Expressive was /wildly/ over-divved, but I have since found a tendency in myself to at least do inner and outer on everything, and four layers on header and content, so I can do things like rounded corners in a completely liquid layout. I haven't gotten to Expressive's level, yet, but I've clearly been corrupted.

Date: 3 Jan 2009 03:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaigou.livejournal.com
Hrm, no idea... which browser are you using? I've only the means to test in FFX2 & Safari, so if it's wonky in MSIE I'll never know unless I get off my duff & test it on CP's PC. (Bleah.)

Yeah, Exp/Mixit is totally overdivved, and I'm dubious as to whether it's really worth it. (Sometimes I think that's done solely to make it very very hard to rip CSS from an existing layout, damn those bastards.) When I'm coding from scratch for myself, I find myself narrowing it down more and more until I have the absolute minimum of classes, and reusing as much as I can. Unfortunately that's pretty impossible with LJ, it seems (and let's not even get started on the layouts still using tables, ugh).

Any chance you can throw a screenshot my way, so I can get an idea of how it looks -- and what are your browser dimensions? I ended up doing this one at 960px layout, which is definitely wider than I'm comfortable with, but on a iMac screen, 700px wide is a freaking single newspaper column AAAUUUGHHH.

Date: 3 Jan 2009 04:11 am (UTC)
branchandroot: oak against sky (Default)
From: [personal profile] branchandroot
I'm using Camino (Gecko kernal, Quartz rendering), and I do keep my browser pretty narrow. I'd guess it's about 800px wide. From what I can see, the content is trying to go all the way to the right edge, and nipping underneath the right scrollbar, so I lose about ten pixels or 1em. This could be a Camino quirk, Camino does throw some strange ones every now and then. My favorite is having to set any text field at width:100% in order to keep it from overrunning the right side of its container. Definite augh material.

*wry* When I was doing expressive, I finally gave up and just made an empty style sheet with every single div on it, to fill in. I usually only used a third of them.

Date: 3 Jan 2009 05:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kaigou.livejournal.com
GUH. Okay, try now? Narrowed it up a little, but sadly it's never going to work as a flexible width (my preference). Eh, well, at least it's closer to 950 than 1000... although there's no code for overflow, nor is there a min width setting, and I'm not sure I'm up to messing with it, if it's at least legible. (Erm, is it? Oi, the whackiness...)

Date: 3 Jan 2009 04:29 pm (UTC)
branchandroot: oak against sky (Default)
From: [personal profile] branchandroot
Ah, yes, that did it! Very nice indeed.

whois

kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
锴 angry fishtrap 狗

to remember

"When you make the finding yourself— even if you're the last person on Earth to see the light— you'll never forget it." —Carl Sagan

October 2016

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011 12131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

expand

No cut tags