let's see how this works.
2 Jan 2009 04:20 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
okay, slightly less grumpy layout style, now. hrmmm. got to say, I really don't care for css where there's eighty freaking titles and embeds on every level. whatever happened to the notion of simple and elegant code?
no subject
Date: 3 Jan 2009 03:32 am (UTC)That said, it's quite snazzy.
*amused* I used to think Expressive was /wildly/ over-divved, but I have since found a tendency in myself to at least do inner and outer on everything, and four layers on header and content, so I can do things like rounded corners in a completely liquid layout. I haven't gotten to Expressive's level, yet, but I've clearly been corrupted.
no subject
Date: 3 Jan 2009 03:47 am (UTC)Yeah, Exp/Mixit is totally overdivved, and I'm dubious as to whether it's really worth it. (Sometimes I think that's done solely to make it very very hard to rip CSS from an existing layout, damn those bastards.) When I'm coding from scratch for myself, I find myself narrowing it down more and more until I have the absolute minimum of classes, and reusing as much as I can. Unfortunately that's pretty impossible with LJ, it seems (and let's not even get started on the layouts still using tables, ugh).
Any chance you can throw a screenshot my way, so I can get an idea of how it looks -- and what are your browser dimensions? I ended up doing this one at 960px layout, which is definitely wider than I'm comfortable with, but on a iMac screen, 700px wide is a freaking single newspaper column AAAUUUGHHH.
no subject
Date: 3 Jan 2009 04:11 am (UTC)*wry* When I was doing expressive, I finally gave up and just made an empty style sheet with every single div on it, to fill in. I usually only used a third of them.
no subject
Date: 3 Jan 2009 05:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 3 Jan 2009 04:29 pm (UTC)