Kifed this link from Tiercel, who had it posted awhile back but I'd never followed it...damn, I should've. You want Narnia? You want Disney doing Narnia? Here's your response, babe.
Cripes, they're doing a live-action version of Charlotte's Web...with Julia Roberts as Charlotte? Yegawdz.
Cripes, they're doing a live-action version of Charlotte's Web...with Julia Roberts as Charlotte? Yegawdz.
no subject
Date: 28 Nov 2005 06:56 pm (UTC)But there was one scene that would only have taken a minute on-screen that I would happily have traded for many other 60-second bits, and that would be one of Denethor with a palantir.
Otherwise he comes off as totally demented, rather than a tool of Sauron.
no subject
Date: 29 Nov 2005 12:46 am (UTC)In a movie, it's so much more controlled. Ah, well, so much less room for the imagination! I think the greatest damage (to me) of LotR (while it did have positives, like making people read the book) is the same damage Rowling said she was worried about with the HP movies: that, from now on, people won't see their Harry Potter or Frodo or whomever, but the actor on the screen. It's very, very hard to overcome that visual.
This is part of the reason I would never see the Cooper series as a movie. More than jsut about any other series, that one has such powerful imagery for me that I don't want someone else mucking about in my visual repetoire and turning Will into some snot-nosed American boy with a cowlick, or turning Jane into a strong-willed modern tomboy, when she really is a girl, and really does do girly things (while also being strong-willed, at the same time).
Actually, the only demented part that did better on second showing was Galadriel's temper tantrum. Seeing it again, it wasn't quite as jarring...then again, I saw it again after being exposed to the truly jarring moment of Faramir trying to take the ring. O.O