contemplations on a thursday
17 Mar 2005 07:14 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
kaigouYet again, comments on another journal post made me ponder, mixed with Mat re-asking the Q I'd had a month ago. And I've learned that posting fresh is always better than writing back a dry response that could be taken any of several ways. Instead, I'll belabor the point so it can be taken all those ways. Etc. Writers, I'd really like your two cents on this one, but it's all behind the cut.
If you want Disney in your fiction, I'm not the author for you.
The mention of "write something less explicit" came up in an earlier thread where I teased AsukaK that I wouldn't write a sex scene in Sunrise, which is effectively a get-together story (both of two siblings and of two lovers, and NOT the same pairings you pervs stop that get away from my babies). Excuse me. I'll try again.
In the MPAA ratings, there are several things that seem to draw the line between PG-13 and R. The first is drug usage. Drug usage can be implied in moderation (ie "they're off to get stoned"), but any depiction of drug usage is R, IIRC. Sexual situations can be implied; think of what soap operas can manage on a daily basis now. You don't have to show a great deal to imply a truckload. Language is an odd one. You can use a single instance of the word 'fuck' in a non-sexual context; two instances and you're R-rated. One instance in a sexual context ("wanna fuck?") and you're R-rated. Violence seems to be a sliding scale; I've seen some pretty damn gory PG-13 films.
It's such a fluid thing. I remember being told Kate Chopin's Awakening was a scandal when it was published for its sexual situations. I think I'd read it twice before I figured out that when the female protagonists sits down on the sofa with the male protagonist...something happened in there. It's all between the lines, and so subtly implied it just misses us completely now. (The entire class was baffled, actually, which made me feel less like a moron for not getting the Victorian hangups.) That said, I can see the value to a limited extent of rating movies, but only in the sense that it's a limiting, limited, and flawed system. One person's majorly intense emotional drama is for 'adults' -- I would never let a child watch The Changeling, for instance; another might look at much of the violence in LotR, for instance, and think it's fine for a ten-year old.
I don't like rating books or stories. I can see the value in it, in fanfiction, because it gives new readers a handle on what to expect. Most fanfiction authors don't have the skills to write teasers and summaries (and most archives don't or won't code for various reasons, mostly time & room on the visual page). Lacking a cover, a blurb, a summary, a teaser, the rating (and pairing info, genre, context, spoilers, etc) are all helpful. But they're not the entire story. In a manner of speaking.
There are two things I've noted when I participate in discussions with friends about 'rating' a story. The first is this odd assumption that all stories (read: movies) containing a gay relationship are automatically NC-17. That's bullshit, plain and simple. The other note is that ratings will be inflated (or reduced with judicious editing or just underestimating), depending on the audience preferred. I know in fanfiction, 90% of the readers out there will skip a G-rated story; it's associated with 'for small children' and who wants to read that when the original series had mecha/alchemy, violence, and war? I've also read stories rated NC-17 and I get to the end and think, you'd be lucky if that were PG. Messing with the rating is an old trick to get attention from one quarter or another, which is one reason I distrust self-labeled works. Ya gotta wonder about the author/creator's slant.
I think the top reason, though, for not rating a story is because that rating now carries a set of expectations: this must be what I get. An adult would look at 'PG' and say, man, that's nothing. Yeah, and Watership Down was PG; you wanna tell me that didn't have major emotional punch? Henry and June -- wasn't that one of the first to be rated NC-17? I watched that, and it's not that there's a great deal of sex depicted in the movie that's really so outlandish. Nekkid boobies, mostly, a few flashes of anything else. Blink & you miss it. What's explicit in it is its frank treatment and discussion of sex, sexuality, and attraction. Oh, and don't forget Henry Miller's wife being a heroin addict, or whatever kind of junkie she was. Today, I wouldn't give that movie more than an R.
The thing with a story is that if it's done right, I don't care about a rating. As a matter of fact, I've fallen in love with some pretty disreputable characters and when I do, I want them as they are, right off the page; I'll grin and bear it through their warts. It's a writer's finest art, to make me like a character I'd want to shoot in person: the bigot, the self-pitying single, the philanderer, the homophobe. Be explicit, because I'm in love. I don't want the whitewashed version when I'm in love. I want stories where the author digs in and reveals all the quirks and unlikeable and likeable parts of a person. How is the writer to know which part will make a reader keep going, or throw the book across the room? For one person, the squick may be the sex; for another, it's the violence, but for me? Ethics. Characters who make the wrong choice for the wrong reason and know it's wrong--but it's helping the plot along!--actually bug me more than anything else. I want those stories rated S. For 'stupid'. As in, "this story may contain moronic character development." Short of shortchanging the story & characters with a rating of S, I don't think you can know as an author, so you write the best story you can, put in as much as you can, and let the readers sort it out.
I think of the PG-13 movies I've seen in the past decade or so, and Dancing really isn't much worse on the list than many of them. Let's put it this way. In a movie, I control what you see, the angle of your viewing, etc. In a movie, I can imply in a PG-13 situation that these two characters are going to have sex: I show the woman's bare back. We could do it like in Dirty Dancing: Baby takes off her shirt to reveal her bra. Camera closes in on the guy's hand going up Baby's back, and then he flicks the bra strap open. Camera cuts to black. You do the math of what happens next, or you don't. In a story, I don't have control over your visual past a certain point, and the more oblique I am, the more there's potential for your interpretation:
That wasn't a bad thing; not a bad thing at all. Hard to beat being having Tetsu's undivided attention. Keegan stretched, chuckling at the ticklish sensation of Tetsu's tongue and fingers meandering across his belly, and arched his back so Tetsu could slide Keegan's jeans off his hips.
Okay. Is Keegan wearing underwear? If he is, it's PG-13. Hell, it could be PG. If he's not? PG-13 with judicious camera angles. R with slightly more provocative angles. But those lines don't say. This is where I feel firmly that if you read a story and say, "that's R-rated!" then there's a chance some of that's in your head. I didn't put it on the page, one way or another. I just implied. Up to you what that implication means.
And some things will go right over people's heads. Drug terminology, for instance; it's a localized, cultural thing. It's like saying to American kids in a brit accent, "got a fag?" No matter what the American kids are like, there's going to be a moment of cognitive dissonance because the lingo doesn't match. I have drug references here and there in Dancing, and again in Sunrise. I betcha the majority are too subtle, and go right over the heads of some folks. However, Garrett likes to get stoned sometimes. If two out of ten people get the offhand comment, does that make the story R? If someone has no issue with homosexual relationships, latenight clubbing for underagers, or premarital sex, but is highly sensitive about drug use being bad, mmkay, is it my problem if this one minor (to me) detail makes the reader toss the book?
I know why I write, and it's not because I want to write the Great American Novel. And it's not really because I want to get rich. (I'm not stupid; I know I'm currently making three times as much as the average low-to-mid-list writer would if s/he tried to live full time off writing advances and royalties.) I write these stories because I can't find them anywhere else. If there were a published author out there writing stories like mine and I liked the author's style and characters and setting, I wouldn't need to write. It'd be there, already, for me to enjoy! But it's not. Oh, there are writers who get this part, or that, but I want it all in one set o' characters. One story, or more, if the characters can hold up.
I want a club scene that remembers there's work involved, and that the job is actually pretty boring with sudden bursts of rare action but limited at that. I want people who cuss, smoke, drink, and drive like bats out of hell. I want bikers who know how to work on their bikes--and do. I want more than just a passel of goddamn british fairies interacting with the local folk; I want more than just the indigenous people interacting with modern folk. I want multiculturalism to the same degree I get in my work life: Hindu, Japanese, Chinese, Kenyan, Lebanese, Yemeni, Brazilian, Inuit, Russsian, Danish. I want sax and violins. The latter because I like action; the former because I'm an adult, damn it, and I have a sexuality and I like characters who haven't repressed or just forgotten that they have hormones, too. What I really want? I want the hard questions playing in the metaphor of urban fantasy.
There's a story by Charles DeLint, hrm, Jack of Kilrowan, I think it is. (Excellent example of horrendous cover: shows a rather Art Deco woman with flowy long hair looking all graceful; the lead character chops off her hip-length hair in the first paragraph of the story. Uh, sure, the artist really read that novel before illustrating.) Anyway, over the course of the first novella, our female protagonist meets and eventually falls for a handsome young fey-prince. At the end of the story, they kiss and the novella's over. That's where we fade to black, like many romantic stories do: we imagine them sailing off into the sunset, blah blah blah. The copy I have is both novellas in one, and when the second story opened, I was all primed: what does it mean to be human and be romantically involved with someone non-human? What are the implications? What do you tell your family? What does s/he tell his/hers? How do you have to change to adapt to such an innate, more-than-just-cultural difference?
And what happens? The character shirks. DeLint set it up in the first novella, that she's uncertain about committment, I felt like saying: come on, you said she was committment-uncertain because she didn't "fit" with so-called normal guys, and you spent 50K words convincing me these two were an odd if delightful fit. And then you what? You copped out! So the second novella skirts that issue by having the male romantic lead basically persona non arounda for 50K. It's still a good story, but dissatisfying because it just wasn't gutsy enough, IMO.
That's why I'll say my stories are R-rated, because if that's where the story goes, that's where I'll chase it. I don't want to say, "I shouldn't write above a certain point," and hearing it from anyone can, will, and does make me one thoroughly-pissed off person. You have to tread very, very carefully when it comes to suggesting to me that I tone things down. I would much rather throw everything in, and make the choice on my own what works or doesn't work for the story; using the story itself to justify your critique is possibly the only way to avoid that knee-jerk "fuck off!" reaction.
Now, the thing is, no one person should take that last paragraph too personally, and no, I don't want to see any apologies. (Don't say sorry; just fix it, damn it.) I think nonwriters forget this, or forget there are some liberties you simply can't take -- well, you can take them, but the writer isn't going to respond in a pretty manner. I try to be careful around other authors, the rare times I'm tempted to say such, except for the rare authors that I know well enough and with whom I'm sympatico; I can list them on one hand. It has a great deal to do with the time and energy we've spent critting each other's work, I think. They know I may suggest but that I respect their boundaries, because it's something I grapple with myself. Getting such comments from folks who don't write, and haven't even read? Yeah. I get annoyed. Highly annoyed.
Ratings might be good for someone going blind into a movie who's highly particular about whether they see a set o' nekkid boobies, or hear a bad word, or see blood 'n gore 'n chainsaws slicing hyundais. But it's ridiculous in fiction, because when I fall in love with a character, I want explicit. I don't want to be deprived of that character's insides and outsides any more than I can conceive of being deprived of any of my lovers' insides and outsides. When I find a character I love, I want to devour him or her, whole. So... yeah. Me, explicit writer. Deal, and more importantly, don't frickin' tell me to tone it down. I won't listen. I'm too busy trying to go deep.
Maybe I'll go write a scene now where Tetsu jacks off. That might make me feel less cranky.
(yes, long long day at work. gee, could you tell?)
If you want Disney in your fiction, I'm not the author for you.
The mention of "write something less explicit" came up in an earlier thread where I teased AsukaK that I wouldn't write a sex scene in Sunrise, which is effectively a get-together story (both of two siblings and of two lovers, and NOT the same pairings you pervs stop that get away from my babies). Excuse me. I'll try again.
In the MPAA ratings, there are several things that seem to draw the line between PG-13 and R. The first is drug usage. Drug usage can be implied in moderation (ie "they're off to get stoned"), but any depiction of drug usage is R, IIRC. Sexual situations can be implied; think of what soap operas can manage on a daily basis now. You don't have to show a great deal to imply a truckload. Language is an odd one. You can use a single instance of the word 'fuck' in a non-sexual context; two instances and you're R-rated. One instance in a sexual context ("wanna fuck?") and you're R-rated. Violence seems to be a sliding scale; I've seen some pretty damn gory PG-13 films.
It's such a fluid thing. I remember being told Kate Chopin's Awakening was a scandal when it was published for its sexual situations. I think I'd read it twice before I figured out that when the female protagonists sits down on the sofa with the male protagonist...something happened in there. It's all between the lines, and so subtly implied it just misses us completely now. (The entire class was baffled, actually, which made me feel less like a moron for not getting the Victorian hangups.) That said, I can see the value to a limited extent of rating movies, but only in the sense that it's a limiting, limited, and flawed system. One person's majorly intense emotional drama is for 'adults' -- I would never let a child watch The Changeling, for instance; another might look at much of the violence in LotR, for instance, and think it's fine for a ten-year old.
I don't like rating books or stories. I can see the value in it, in fanfiction, because it gives new readers a handle on what to expect. Most fanfiction authors don't have the skills to write teasers and summaries (and most archives don't or won't code for various reasons, mostly time & room on the visual page). Lacking a cover, a blurb, a summary, a teaser, the rating (and pairing info, genre, context, spoilers, etc) are all helpful. But they're not the entire story. In a manner of speaking.
There are two things I've noted when I participate in discussions with friends about 'rating' a story. The first is this odd assumption that all stories (read: movies) containing a gay relationship are automatically NC-17. That's bullshit, plain and simple. The other note is that ratings will be inflated (or reduced with judicious editing or just underestimating), depending on the audience preferred. I know in fanfiction, 90% of the readers out there will skip a G-rated story; it's associated with 'for small children' and who wants to read that when the original series had mecha/alchemy, violence, and war? I've also read stories rated NC-17 and I get to the end and think, you'd be lucky if that were PG. Messing with the rating is an old trick to get attention from one quarter or another, which is one reason I distrust self-labeled works. Ya gotta wonder about the author/creator's slant.
I think the top reason, though, for not rating a story is because that rating now carries a set of expectations: this must be what I get. An adult would look at 'PG' and say, man, that's nothing. Yeah, and Watership Down was PG; you wanna tell me that didn't have major emotional punch? Henry and June -- wasn't that one of the first to be rated NC-17? I watched that, and it's not that there's a great deal of sex depicted in the movie that's really so outlandish. Nekkid boobies, mostly, a few flashes of anything else. Blink & you miss it. What's explicit in it is its frank treatment and discussion of sex, sexuality, and attraction. Oh, and don't forget Henry Miller's wife being a heroin addict, or whatever kind of junkie she was. Today, I wouldn't give that movie more than an R.
The thing with a story is that if it's done right, I don't care about a rating. As a matter of fact, I've fallen in love with some pretty disreputable characters and when I do, I want them as they are, right off the page; I'll grin and bear it through their warts. It's a writer's finest art, to make me like a character I'd want to shoot in person: the bigot, the self-pitying single, the philanderer, the homophobe. Be explicit, because I'm in love. I don't want the whitewashed version when I'm in love. I want stories where the author digs in and reveals all the quirks and unlikeable and likeable parts of a person. How is the writer to know which part will make a reader keep going, or throw the book across the room? For one person, the squick may be the sex; for another, it's the violence, but for me? Ethics. Characters who make the wrong choice for the wrong reason and know it's wrong--but it's helping the plot along!--actually bug me more than anything else. I want those stories rated S. For 'stupid'. As in, "this story may contain moronic character development." Short of shortchanging the story & characters with a rating of S, I don't think you can know as an author, so you write the best story you can, put in as much as you can, and let the readers sort it out.
I think of the PG-13 movies I've seen in the past decade or so, and Dancing really isn't much worse on the list than many of them. Let's put it this way. In a movie, I control what you see, the angle of your viewing, etc. In a movie, I can imply in a PG-13 situation that these two characters are going to have sex: I show the woman's bare back. We could do it like in Dirty Dancing: Baby takes off her shirt to reveal her bra. Camera closes in on the guy's hand going up Baby's back, and then he flicks the bra strap open. Camera cuts to black. You do the math of what happens next, or you don't. In a story, I don't have control over your visual past a certain point, and the more oblique I am, the more there's potential for your interpretation:
That wasn't a bad thing; not a bad thing at all. Hard to beat being having Tetsu's undivided attention. Keegan stretched, chuckling at the ticklish sensation of Tetsu's tongue and fingers meandering across his belly, and arched his back so Tetsu could slide Keegan's jeans off his hips.
Okay. Is Keegan wearing underwear? If he is, it's PG-13. Hell, it could be PG. If he's not? PG-13 with judicious camera angles. R with slightly more provocative angles. But those lines don't say. This is where I feel firmly that if you read a story and say, "that's R-rated!" then there's a chance some of that's in your head. I didn't put it on the page, one way or another. I just implied. Up to you what that implication means.
And some things will go right over people's heads. Drug terminology, for instance; it's a localized, cultural thing. It's like saying to American kids in a brit accent, "got a fag?" No matter what the American kids are like, there's going to be a moment of cognitive dissonance because the lingo doesn't match. I have drug references here and there in Dancing, and again in Sunrise. I betcha the majority are too subtle, and go right over the heads of some folks. However, Garrett likes to get stoned sometimes. If two out of ten people get the offhand comment, does that make the story R? If someone has no issue with homosexual relationships, latenight clubbing for underagers, or premarital sex, but is highly sensitive about drug use being bad, mmkay, is it my problem if this one minor (to me) detail makes the reader toss the book?
I know why I write, and it's not because I want to write the Great American Novel. And it's not really because I want to get rich. (I'm not stupid; I know I'm currently making three times as much as the average low-to-mid-list writer would if s/he tried to live full time off writing advances and royalties.) I write these stories because I can't find them anywhere else. If there were a published author out there writing stories like mine and I liked the author's style and characters and setting, I wouldn't need to write. It'd be there, already, for me to enjoy! But it's not. Oh, there are writers who get this part, or that, but I want it all in one set o' characters. One story, or more, if the characters can hold up.
I want a club scene that remembers there's work involved, and that the job is actually pretty boring with sudden bursts of rare action but limited at that. I want people who cuss, smoke, drink, and drive like bats out of hell. I want bikers who know how to work on their bikes--and do. I want more than just a passel of goddamn british fairies interacting with the local folk; I want more than just the indigenous people interacting with modern folk. I want multiculturalism to the same degree I get in my work life: Hindu, Japanese, Chinese, Kenyan, Lebanese, Yemeni, Brazilian, Inuit, Russsian, Danish. I want sax and violins. The latter because I like action; the former because I'm an adult, damn it, and I have a sexuality and I like characters who haven't repressed or just forgotten that they have hormones, too. What I really want? I want the hard questions playing in the metaphor of urban fantasy.
There's a story by Charles DeLint, hrm, Jack of Kilrowan, I think it is. (Excellent example of horrendous cover: shows a rather Art Deco woman with flowy long hair looking all graceful; the lead character chops off her hip-length hair in the first paragraph of the story. Uh, sure, the artist really read that novel before illustrating.) Anyway, over the course of the first novella, our female protagonist meets and eventually falls for a handsome young fey-prince. At the end of the story, they kiss and the novella's over. That's where we fade to black, like many romantic stories do: we imagine them sailing off into the sunset, blah blah blah. The copy I have is both novellas in one, and when the second story opened, I was all primed: what does it mean to be human and be romantically involved with someone non-human? What are the implications? What do you tell your family? What does s/he tell his/hers? How do you have to change to adapt to such an innate, more-than-just-cultural difference?
And what happens? The character shirks. DeLint set it up in the first novella, that she's uncertain about committment, I felt like saying: come on, you said she was committment-uncertain because she didn't "fit" with so-called normal guys, and you spent 50K words convincing me these two were an odd if delightful fit. And then you what? You copped out! So the second novella skirts that issue by having the male romantic lead basically persona non arounda for 50K. It's still a good story, but dissatisfying because it just wasn't gutsy enough, IMO.
That's why I'll say my stories are R-rated, because if that's where the story goes, that's where I'll chase it. I don't want to say, "I shouldn't write above a certain point," and hearing it from anyone can, will, and does make me one thoroughly-pissed off person. You have to tread very, very carefully when it comes to suggesting to me that I tone things down. I would much rather throw everything in, and make the choice on my own what works or doesn't work for the story; using the story itself to justify your critique is possibly the only way to avoid that knee-jerk "fuck off!" reaction.
Now, the thing is, no one person should take that last paragraph too personally, and no, I don't want to see any apologies. (Don't say sorry; just fix it, damn it.) I think nonwriters forget this, or forget there are some liberties you simply can't take -- well, you can take them, but the writer isn't going to respond in a pretty manner. I try to be careful around other authors, the rare times I'm tempted to say such, except for the rare authors that I know well enough and with whom I'm sympatico; I can list them on one hand. It has a great deal to do with the time and energy we've spent critting each other's work, I think. They know I may suggest but that I respect their boundaries, because it's something I grapple with myself. Getting such comments from folks who don't write, and haven't even read? Yeah. I get annoyed. Highly annoyed.
Ratings might be good for someone going blind into a movie who's highly particular about whether they see a set o' nekkid boobies, or hear a bad word, or see blood 'n gore 'n chainsaws slicing hyundais. But it's ridiculous in fiction, because when I fall in love with a character, I want explicit. I don't want to be deprived of that character's insides and outsides any more than I can conceive of being deprived of any of my lovers' insides and outsides. When I find a character I love, I want to devour him or her, whole. So... yeah. Me, explicit writer. Deal, and more importantly, don't frickin' tell me to tone it down. I won't listen. I'm too busy trying to go deep.
Maybe I'll go write a scene now where Tetsu jacks off. That might make me feel less cranky.
(yes, long long day at work. gee, could you tell?)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Let's have a big round of applause
Date: 18 Mar 2005 01:04 am (UTC)The whole thing came as a big shock because on the whole I'm a pretty mild-mannered person and my characters are not rude boys. Working class and middle class, mostly. Those just aren't the kinds of stories I tell. I hope they're intense and mean something, and I certainly won't back off whatever language is necessary if that's what the character uses. But it's really got very little bearing on whether the story is any good.
And it's all the author's choice. If a reader doesn't like it, they can read a different book.
--bonnie
awww ;D
Date: 18 Mar 2005 01:29 am (UTC)Thing is, I'm not really sure my boys are rude in the classic sense. I guess they're more rude in that they really don't give a damn what the rest of the world thinks of them. Was it Mellencamp's lyrics? Yeah. "I do things my way and I pay a high price." Oddly, the rest of the world does tend to see such independence as rude or uncultured, but if you're willing to pay the price...
I dunno. We all chase the oddest characters, don't we?
no subject
Date: 18 Mar 2005 02:52 am (UTC)I've seen enough references to this and I'm being a nosy bitch. Who said that?
no subject
Date: 18 Mar 2005 03:00 am (UTC)Me: you want Keegan to what? Newsflash, babe, contrary to popular jokes, there is not a secret handshake amongst gay folk. Puhleeeese.
But it did send me into paroxyms, sometimes of laughter, sometimes of screaming, since it was random enough to make me question whether or not anyone had gotten the point of the kiss right there at the end of the first chapter. Yes, it's there for a reason. Sheesh. Fortunately, Slobbit was there and commented via priv msg, and...here we are. Gey Card an' all. ;D
no subject
Date: 18 Mar 2005 03:07 am (UTC)*dies laughing* Maybe she wanted Keegan to flash a neon sign that says "I'm teh ghei"? Playing the gay card, huh? I wasn't really aware there was one, but then again maybe I just don't care. Fancy that.
no subject
Date: 18 Mar 2005 03:40 am (UTC)Other than that, I'm really not sure.
no subject
Date: 18 Mar 2005 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 18 Mar 2005 01:42 pm (UTC)Re: awww ;D
Date: 18 Mar 2005 12:07 pm (UTC)eh hm
Not only has it let me muscle deeper into Yoshi, but Saburo as well. In fact, Saburo's the one who's benefited the most from my leaving the old group.
Of course the new revelations only make things much worse for him . . . but he's a tough guy. He can handle.
And yes, we do chase odd characters. Or they chase us.
just sayin it like it is
Date: 18 Mar 2005 01:45 pm (UTC)IMO. A'course, time will tell once we meet up with editors who tell us where to get off. Heh. Or where not to. "Look, I understand Saburo's been waiting nineteen chapters for a kiss, but groping the female protag just won't work in this story, and if you send Takeko to give me nightmares one more time, I'm gonna dump the story in the circular bin!"
*snerk*
Re: awww ;D
Date: 18 Mar 2005 12:18 pm (UTC)Yeah, we do chase the oddest characters, and the thing that scares me sometimes is that those characters come from me, my own dark corners and deepest fears and perversions and everything else. They don't get handed to me by some cute muse standing on the desk. I dig them out of the muck and mess in my head.
And yes, I'm better off without that group. I knew it even at the time. It was a long path, but I feel like I'm finally getting to where I can really muscle into a character like Michael. He's very close to some of my deepest fears and most painful memories, and he's a character I couldn't even have imagined a year ago, let alone dared write about.
--bonnie
yep
Date: 18 Mar 2005 01:47 pm (UTC)Re: yep
Date: 22 Mar 2005 06:55 am (UTC)An uncensored environment is lovely to have as I can still remember my fiction class at college that pretty much shut me down as a writer with the teacher's attitude toward what he thought I was writing. Not what I was writing mind you but...he thought that I was and hated the genre. Siigh.
no subject
Date: 22 Mar 2005 12:57 pm (UTC)Easier to cull down than add, really. ;D
no subject
Date: 18 Mar 2005 02:51 am (UTC)Is that why you asked me about the appropriate rating for your stories before your first post on Manic Medley? (Before, you know, I re-found the list of ratings on FM.) I never knew.
I remember getting really pissy when Kathy (piney) related the story of the writing instructor slamming her YA WIP, because--heaven forbid--it dealt with the subject of cutting.
no subject
Date: 18 Mar 2005 03:41 am (UTC)Or something. Dunno. I just wrote about dead people, so I'm in a wacky mode at this minute.
no subject
Date: 18 Mar 2005 12:29 pm (UTC)Yeah, piney's story is pretty tough. I can understand someone saying, "I'm sorry, this is too much for me to handle." I can't understand why so many people insist on translating that to, "I can't handle this subject, or your treatment of this subject, therefore you shouldn't write it."
Sigh.
--bonnie