Wait, this is for a server contract? I must have been reading too fast: I thought it was for a blogging site or something. Okay, suddenly this is looking a lot less reasonable, and a lot more like the company's lawyers just got lazy and stole the clauses from a blogging service. On the theory, no doubt, that overreaching violently couldn't hurt them.
no subject
Date: 16 Oct 2011 08:52 pm (UTC)