Good point about the vandalism. Then maybe allow edits under a certain threshold (maybe per page?) to go without issue, but mass-edits to require security question?
-- It could be just as easy to allow deletions to rest for 24 hours, 48 hours, even 7 days, because those are just links flagged for clearance on X date. Not so easy if it's a matter of undoing edits (ie tag-name-changes) since that means saving the old and new. Hmmm. (It's possible, it's just something I'd have to defer to a developer to say whether there's a technical constraint on that, or maybe "undo option on tag editing" would be another premium feature).
I think it seems reasonable that if you have a bundle named Label_X and you tag something as label_X, that it could ask if you want it auto-added to the bundle by that same name... or maybe just add an option in the add-new-link function that lets you add the link, tag it, AND immediately add it to one/more bundles, stacks, groups, etc, at the same time?
no subject
Date: 3 Oct 2011 05:26 am (UTC)-- It could be just as easy to allow deletions to rest for 24 hours, 48 hours, even 7 days, because those are just links flagged for clearance on X date. Not so easy if it's a matter of undoing edits (ie tag-name-changes) since that means saving the old and new. Hmmm. (It's possible, it's just something I'd have to defer to a developer to say whether there's a technical constraint on that, or maybe "undo option on tag editing" would be another premium feature).
I think it seems reasonable that if you have a bundle named Label_X and you tag something as label_X, that it could ask if you want it auto-added to the bundle by that same name... or maybe just add an option in the add-new-link function that lets you add the link, tag it, AND immediately add it to one/more bundles, stacks, groups, etc, at the same time?