Date: 22 Nov 2004 11:06 pm (UTC)
Wouldn't that be treated as one of those things - who's going to have a baby when they can barely feed themselves, already? I mean, assuming there's a choice on the part of the parents. I'd think most potential parents would look at the world and say, "we'll wait until it's a bit better, thanks," and the birth rate would drop to ridiculously low levels?

I don't think so. People are amazingly stupid when it comes to things like this. The birth rate, I think, would stay almost constant...it's the infant/youth mortality rate that would skyrocket.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

whois

kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
锴 angry fishtrap 狗

to remember

"When you make the finding yourself— even if you're the last person on Earth to see the light— you'll never forget it." —Carl Sagan

October 2016

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011 12131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

expand

No cut tags