Date: 15 Feb 2005 03:10 am (UTC)
Really well done. Very sharp analysis and you put together disparate parts of public policy quite nicely. Are you sure you weren't an economist in a previous life? I bet you'd be a Keynesian.

Yes, one though that monetarism and the excesses of the supply-side had been discredited long ago and we all became Keynesian in the 90s (ie, the government should save and not overstimulate the economy when growth is high, and then should spend and stimulate the economy when growth is low or negative). But both now and then, those who espouse these views do so not on the basis of sound economic policy but rather on political grounds. They forget that the two main features upon which any economic policy should be evaluated is not just efficiency but equity. And sometimes intergenrational equity needs to be considered. Are we going to spend up big and just leave it to future generations to clean up our mess? They are trying to put one over on the American people but luckily there are enough conscientious participants like you to hopefully stop them. Let's hope that this goes the way of the failed health care reforms of the 90s.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

whois

kaigou: this is what I do, darling (Default)
锴 angry fishtrap 狗

to remember

"When you make the finding yourself— even if you're the last person on Earth to see the light— you'll never forget it." —Carl Sagan

October 2016

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011 12131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

expand

No cut tags